Search This Blog

Followers

Saturday, 1 October 2016

Clungunford and Clunbury, Clunton and Clun


 © Stephen Bigger 1st October 2012

Clungunford and Clunbury, Clunton and Clun
Are the quietest places under the sun (Neglected Mountain, p.99)
 Stephen Bigger

Ida Gandy (1885-1977) is well-known in Wiltshire for gentle country books, most written in old age. A doctor’s wife, they bought a new practice in Clunbury, Shropshire from 1930 having fallen in love with the area during a holiday. She wrote her memoir of these years when she was 80, entitled An Idler on the Shropshire Borders. Clunbury is in the wedge between Clun, Craven Arms and Bishops Castle, skirting the south end of the Long Mynd and not far from Cwm Head and Prior’s Halt/Witchend. The area particularly features in The Secret of Grey Walls (where Jon and Penny arrive in Craven Arms and whilst some cycle to Clun, the others take the bus); and in The Neglected Mountain (where we meet Trudie Whittington, the Bishop Castle vet’s daughter who is to become Charles Sterling’s wife).

Ida Gandy’s book about life in and around Clunbury in the 1930s gives a delightful view of this section of Shropshire, telling how she tramped around with her young children, exploring, picnicking, and meeting locals. At much the same time, the Savilles visited the same area, so Ida Gandy’s book provides much local colour and atmosphere. The ‘idler’ of the title refers to the fact that everyone was busy with their tasks, and were surprised that she had the time to wander about with her two sons and daughter. This is how she described the local men at a farm auction: “Many of the men were of racy type, with faces which, if not handsome, were strongly individual, shrewd or humorous. Many wore faded velveteen jackets and brightly coloured scarves around their necks.” (pp.15f). The family got their milk from Chapel Farm, much as Witchend was serviced by its local farm. Being in the WI, Mrs Gandy went around meeting people, much as Mrs Morton was hospitable to the likes of Jasper Sterling and even the spy Mrs Thurston.

One local story has resemblances to The Secret of Gray Walls. A gang of poachers and sheep rustlers lived nearby around 1850. One in the house signalled the all clear by hanging a sheet out of the window. “At other times the gang would be off over the hills after sheep. They were such a wild, crafty lot that they never got caught. But things grew too hot for them at last, and they disappeared.” (p.28). The sheep were “true natives” – black-faced Clun Valley breed. But there were also white faced ‘Kerries’ (from the village of Kerry near Newtown) in abundance, and it was not unknown for the unwary to find that the black face on the sheep they had bought at auction washed off in the rain.

Another local story featured a young man who “sick to death of life on a tyrannical father’s farm, resolves to seek work in the town.” (p.41). Although mother and sister pleaded with him to stay, there was a fierce row during which the father threw the lad out into the pouring rain, telling him to go to the devil. The lad drowned as a footbridge over the river was swept away. There is a clear resemblance to the plot of Seven White Gates! Mrs Gandy was keen on amateur dramatics, as Saville also was, and wrote and produced a play about the story. She submitted it to BBC Midlands and it was accepted (with some modifications) as a radio play. The ‘young man’ was played by a porter at the local railway station. A follow-up national broadcast was made about life in a Shropshire village, reviewed excellently in the Manchester Guardian, and a piece for Children’s Hour about witchcraft in Shropshire (the devil’s chair, phantom hounds of Wild Edrick and similar). Perhaps Malcolm Saville heard some of these; certainly he talked with the same local people who, like Jenny, took these stories seriously. Like Jasper Sterling loving reading books in his lonely cottage and knowing them off by heart, Mrs Gandy describes another local who bought a shilling’s worth of second hand books and read and re-read them: she brought him new books when she visited.

A local train ran from Craven Arms to Llangunlo (and thereafter to Builth and beyond to mid Wales) via Knighton. She tells a story of this line of the day they went to Llangunlo but for the return journey she arrived with her children just as the train was leaving the station. During the two hour wait for the next, she describes how she chatted with the station staff, who received messages about which station the train had just left.

She liked to visit the river Onny, especially near Horderley (a short distance from Prior’s Holt/Witchend) and describes the little Bishop’s Castle railway at the Horderley crossing gates. Her daughter Jill was running on ahead: “But I soon realised there was no cause for anxiety. The funny little train came puffing gently along as though it had eternity before it, and in front of it ran six hens. That was the dearest little railway I ever met, and it passed through a rare bit of country, the Onny on one side and the Long Mynd rising, fold on fold, above it” (p.122). When clean, the engines could be seen to be painted green: it would be either Carlisle, with tender, or No. 1, a tank engine. The railway appears on the map in Wings Over Witchend and in the Foreword, Saville says: “If you are clever, you will be able to find traces of an old railway track which once linked Craven Arms to Bishop’s Castle”. In the story, the twins find the station’s derelict booking buildings full of stolen Christmas trees: “When they were nearer they saw that where the rails had once been laid in a single track was now a grassy lane, and here again the snow had been churned into mud by the wheels of cars. The old platform had nearly crumbled away. The windows of the tiny waiting room and booking office had been without glass for years, and as they stepped across the threshold they realized that they had fitted together another part of the puzzle. The old booking office was packed from floor to ceiling with Christmas trees” (p.187). Unfortunately, they were then kidnapped, and Mackie the dog shot at. Most of Saville’s villains hate dogs. Today the old station is a private house. On a separate visit to the Onny, after seeing kingfishers fishing, she says: “Above me the Long Mynd was again multi-colourerd. From a little grey home, guarded by two Scots firs, on the hillside, a woman came out and stood there with the low sunlight making a halo around her head” (p.124). The ‘lone pine’ two miles away clearly had some company. Nearby she watched cloggers making their clogs.  Incidentally, the stream that flows through Marshbrook (Onnybrook of Mystery at Witchend) is a tributary of the Onny.

On another occasion they went to the old lead-mines (the boys found an old mining truck and had great games riding down on it) and the Stiperstones, the Nipstone and the Devil’s Chair. There were many red squirrels and foxes, she revealed. They parked in The Bog, about which she had little pleasant to say; and by the time they got back to the car, the damp mist had settled over the Stiperstones.

Another Saville link is mentioned beyond Clun, which Mrs Gandy visited on a car trip (p.57). She had read The Lady of Bleeding Heart Yard which told her of Lady Frances Coke who at the age of 15 was forced by her stepfather Sir Edward Coke to marry Sir John Villiers, brother to the Duke of Buckingham. She was imprisoned, beaten, and given savage penance. Her children were declared illegitimate, and her husband went mad. Nevertheless she managed to get away and live in the Hall of the Forest, beyond  Newcastle village on the Welsh borders near Clun with her true love Sir Robert Howard. A brass to Sir Robert Howard is in Clun church. This story, and many other details, are found in Arthur Mee’s Shropshire (1939), written too late to guide the author at the time, but certainly a nudge to her memories. Elements of this Villiers/Buckingham connection are seen in Palace for the Buckinghams, but the use of the name Buckingham possibly shows an early knowledge of this story, and that the last Buckingham book was planned when the first was written and the name Buckingham first introduced (unless the Villiers connection was a happy accident).

The Neglected Mountain contains scenes in Bishop’s Castle Fair in the Summer Holidays. This is brought to life by Mrs Gandy, who calls them the “May Fairs”:
“Numerous gypsies camped in the small bye-lanes round the Forest when the season of the May Fairs began. Bishop’s Castle, Ludlow, Craven Arms, Knighton and Clun each had its Fair in succession. People from all the villages from miles around flocked in to ride on the roundabouts, have their fortunes told, see the Fat Lady, buy gingerbread and the clever toys that the gypsies made… One May evening, Jill [her daughter] and I lost our way in a tangle of small lanes up behind Clun, and found them alive with gypsies. They were picnicking on the grassy borders or wandering along with their dogs. The children, with heads of wild, black hair, kept stealing from holes in the hedges, to look at us. Horses and ponies, many of them piebald, strayed all over the place. The women threw at us those compelling, yet at the same time resistible, glances in which they excel… (pp.97-8)
I am sure that adventure is not too far away. Prejudice against Romany ‘gypsies’ was even then strong, so tales of friendships across the divide contained particularly important messages for child readers. Ida Gandy’s remembered account of life in the 1930s brings home the world that the Saville family encountered when they made their first visit, when horses and carts outnumbered cars, when water was taken by bucket from wells and streams, and people not only wore but made clogs and other family essentials. Mrs Gandy was also observant of birds, and like Malcolm Saville her favourite was the goldfinch. She describes watching a flock of herons, in a heronry of at least 28 nests, near the old iron-age enclosure Bury Ditches, which reminds us of Bury Fields, Alan Denton’s farm.  “The young birds made themselves known by a sharp, metallic clucking, first from one nest, then from another. Sometimes a mother gave an admonishing cry as though to order silence, an order that always seemed to be obeyed” (p.142). The one bird she does not mention, unfortunately, is the peewit, but if they had been common, a peewit call would not have been of much use as a club signal.

end

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Ontology: the visibility of the researcher

PhD students in Education are commonly faced with the word Ontology, so here are a few of my thoughts that I hope are helpful.
What is Ontology?
The term comes from the Greek 'study of being' - the study of what is, of reality.
There is an issue here, how do we know 'what is' as opposed to 'what we think is'. An ontology cannot be written in absolute terms: we have to be satisfied with exploring what we consider to be reality. We may have a realistic certainty about some things - about our bodies and environment, for example, believing these to be real rather than fantasy. Nevertheless, some individuals live in fantasy with little perception of reality.
There is an alternative term, phenomenology, meaning 'study of appearances'. This ties in well with 'what we consider to be real' and it is no surprise that phenomenology has become an alternative or replacement term. Phenomenology tends to refer to biographical rather than autobiographical information.

How are Ontologies Used?
Mainly to locate the researcher vis a vis the research. In any research there are issues of bias and reliability so it is useful to see how the researcher came to be in the position of researcher. This will give a clue about the nature and objectives of the research, and even its significance and importance. Research into education by a practitioner will be different in many ways from research done by an outsider. That is not to say it will be better or worse, just different. Ethnography has traditionally been done by outsider observers, which need not imply that it is better than an insider observer.
Thus, the ontology provides a description of the personal involvement of the researcher with the research, which is part of the general context of the research.

The ontology has a particular role to play in an action research where the focus is centrally placed on the researcher as actor in the action - i.e. researching one's own actions in context. Action research is far more than 'this is my problem, this is my plan, this is how it went'. There has to be an inherent criticality to all issues involved. In particular, the place of the researcher in the action needs to be decontructed. A teacher beginning an action research may have a completely false view of their own performance and influence in the social nexus that we call the school or classroom. Teachers generally will not see themselves as the source of the problem but focus on the pupils being the problem: this may be an entirely false position. The ontology therefore needs some sort of critical underpinning to ask questions about the assumptions being taken for granted. We use the word 'critical' as shorthand for a wide range of fundamental questions.

Autobiography in research.
Research is wrongly stereotyped as 'objective'. In all research, the researcher has to make choices and decisions based subjectively on attitudes, values and assumptions. However, research labelled as positivist (e.g. experimental science) sidelines this area of researcher choice. Thomas Kuhn's hard-hitting study (1961 and with later expanded editions) showed that research assumptions are consolidated into a paradigm, or generally accepted framework, which prevented new contradictory research from being funded, and its results being accepted. The first step of autobiography therefore is to challenge assumptions, however unassailable they seem at the time.

Various fields use autobiography as a central methodology, in particular those on the critical research paradigm. These traditionally focus on race, class, gender or disability, but could address any aspect of social oppression. Paulo Freire was a key figure in the movement. Of these, feminist research has taken autobiography the furthest, examining the psyche of women in society. Here nothing is sacred - even academic studies of female bodyshock after mastectomies. The key question is are there areas relevant to human life worthy of research which can only be researched using an autobiological methodology. This is not dissimilar to the question faced by Glaser and Strauss which led to qualitative methodology and grounded theory: how can people's experience of the closeness of death be researched?

Dangers and threats in the use of autobiography.
The greatest danger is of self-deception leading to bias. To strengthen reliability triangulation should be sought - other people's views and memories of the same events. This is not totally dissimilar to threats to reliability on positivist paradigms, but demonstrating reliability in autobiographical research is perhaps more challenging. Some methods bracket away truth claims to solve this: autobiography makes a truth claim but need not be accepted as truth. The research therefore focuses on perceptions rather than their absolute truth.

All research contains a danger of over-claiming significance in making generalisations. Autobiography has to be particularly cautious in this.

Summary.
Ontology is a statement of where, why and how a researcher stands vis a vis his/her research, stating what they regard as reality. The statement should explain why. Thus, ontology declares the researcher's engagement with the research topic, explaining why the topic is important. It should also contain details of distancing techniques to ensure that the autobiographical interpretations are not fantasy.

Monday, 11 February 2013

Plagiarism

A lot of politicians are being accused of plagiarism at the moment - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21395102

10 of my students have been awarded PhDs and I have as many ongoing students - none have plagiarised. How do I know?


Because I have alerted them to the dangers and monitored them step by step and chapter by chapter. Their work is about their professional practice and is therefore unique. Similar material not downloadable. No one else has done their particular research focus before . 


If students have plagiarised, their supervisors should have spotted it. Universities in their turn need to give supervisors sufficient paid time to supervise properly. One of my Masters students once plagiarised in his dissertation draft. One third of the dissertation was copied and pasted from an uncited article on the internet. It was easily found, via google, not even the specialist software. He had to resubmit honestly. I suspect he had a history of academic cheating never picked up before.


Less deliberate acts of plagiarism are much more common, and it is these that may be getting the politicians into trouble, as they do not appear to be aware that they have plagiarised. It happens because of poor research practice. They read a book, jot down points they are interested in but don't remember to put quotation marks around verbatim notes. Later, they read their notes and use the passage, not remembering that it is a verbatim quote and treating it as their own words. So a little bit of plagiarism creeps in.


I recommend therefore research hygiene: always put quotation marks where they are needed even in rough notes - it is not arduous. And put the page number in the margin to save you trying to find the page reference later.


Some plagiarism is academic incompetence and some is deliberate deception. Deception (cheating) should put politicians out of a job, but incompetence is a different matter. Few politicians are competent anyway.

Tuesday, 27 December 2011

Philosophical Roots of (American) Anthropology

This book, by William Y(ewdale) Adams (1998) has been on my shelves making me feel guilty. No longer. Why do anthropologists do what they do, indulging in the natural history of the human species. They don't look at themselves but leave that to sociologists. They concentrate on 'other', people different from white middle-class Americans - people in tribes, the Papua or Amazonian rain forests and so on. Is this studying humans in their raw state? (and are these people really 'primitive'?). Is the fact that they are uneducated (into western values) part of the attraction? I am not going to summarise the book, a survey of many philosophical schools. The conclusion indicates that the author doesn't know the answer either, either for the anthropology profession as a whole, or for individual anthropologists. We can't keep the 'primitive' in aspic, in a cultural museum, so many now educated descendants of classic studies may well not appreciate what has been concluded in their family name.  The anthropologist goes in, observes, listens, and then describes. They have then had pet theories - evolutionism (we still talk of stone-age aboriginees and bushmen), functionalism, structuralism - most of which have now withered. The answer may be the same as why do we bother, with great discomfort for the professionals,  to follow moose and snow tigers and watch them killing and having sex.  Seeing rare things, admiring, the thrill of the chase, the collecting instinct perhaps. 'I have seen a trance dance, got the photos and the tea-shirt'.

An educational parallel are those who go into schools as observers, watch, listen, comment. They may use a theory or two to help find a way through the dense forest of words, gestures and transactions. They may believe people they should be more sceptical of, and seek out people whose voices might otherwise be silent. They purpose, perhaps to cast light on something that needs attention and suggest improvements. That is a political philosophy, a demand for quality, for justice, for equity, and for respect. Tom Harrisson the anthropologist did this in the 1930s in Savage Civilisation - the savages of course meaning us, the imperial powers. Others, like  Napoleon Chagnon, on the Yanomami, did great damage (for status and profit) by describing the tribe as chronically violent and providing excuses for genocide by loggers. An anthropologist today has to be socially critical: in schools, this excites an interest in power and powerlessness, democracy and voice, freedom and repression, sarcasm and support, bullies and victims (adult as well as young), deception and honesty, lies and truth. An educational anthropologist with such an interest would probably not be invited into school twice. 

Sunday, 25 December 2011

Garden Blog

To see our garden on Christmas morning, see
http://romancourtgardens.blogspot.com/
Christmas Greetings, Stephen

Sunday, 18 December 2011

Marriage and statistics

Nick Clegg criticises tax breaks for married couples as social engineering.
The Tory Centre for Social Justice think-tank's  Gavin Poole said: "Nick Clegg's stance flies in the face of all the evidence, completely ignoring national and international data demonstrating how important marriage is to the health and well-being of children and families."Marriage is important because one in three couples who live together when a child is born split up before that child is five, compared to only one in 11 married couples."
The logic then is that if more people are bribed to marry, they will stay together longer. I am not against marriage, having been married 43 years and counting, but am against the abuse of statistics. Those couples with a deep commitment tend to stay together longer and tend to get married. Those who don't get married may have a deep commitment (2 out of 3 stay together on these figures and some would marry over time) leaving a comparatively larger number (as compared with the married group) of insecure couples in this non-married group. These are not suddenly going to become more secure because they have a marriage licence.
The argument is therefore statistical nonsense. 

Thursday, 8 December 2011

Children on the street.

A long absence, my apologies. Too much other writing.


This item is about my former PhD student, Barnabe D'Souza in Mumbai. He has worked tirelessly for most of his life working with street children, attempting to rehabilitate them into jobs and worthwhile lives. This means educating them about drugs and safe behaviours, and offering them a sense of togetherness and purpose. Needless to say their lives judder from one crisis to the next. Abandoned once, society at large would continue to abandon them unless strong people get up and struggle on their behalf.
Congratulations to Barnabe. His PhD thesis is available on http://eprints.worc.ac.uk/512. His book From Ecstasy to Agony and Back: Journeying with Adolescents on the Street is available from Sage.